MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7080125919 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.17062914

Paraconiothyrium archidendri Verkley, Goker and Stielow

2025· article· en· W7080125919 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConidiumTaxonomy (biology)SnagHost (biology)Key (lock)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Paraconiothyrium archidendri Verkley, Göker and Stielow, Persoonia 32: 37 (2014) Fig. 10 Description. Saprobic on a dead stem of Citrus maxima (Rutaceae). Sexual morph: Undetermined. Asexual morph: Coelomycetous. Conidiomata 100–150 × 100–170 µm (x ̄ = 105 × 135 µm, n = 10), pycnidial, immersed to semi-immersed, dark brown to black, solitary to aggregated, globose to sub-globose. Conidiomatal wall 15–30 μm wide (x ̄ = 17 µm), thick-walled, composed of several layers of brown to dark brown pseudoparenchymatous cells, cells towards the inside hyaline, arranged in a textura angularis, fusing at the outside indistinguishable from the host tissues. Conidiophores reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells 6–8 × 3–4 µm (x ̄ = 6.4 × 3.2 µm, n = 20), discrete, hyaline, globose to doliiform, holoblastic. Conidia 5.8–7 × 3–4 (x ̄ = 6.3 × 3.2 µm, n = 40) µm, variable in shape, subglobose to ellipsoid, rarely obovoid, ends rounded, aseptate, initially hyaline, becoming olivaceous-brown at maturity, contents with several small oil droplets, smooth-walled. Known hosts. Acer pentaphyllum, Alliaria petiolate, Cinnamomum camphora, Citrus maxima, Coffea arabica, Ginkgo biloba, Magnolia sp., Picea glauca, Pinus tabulaeformis, Pithecolobium bigeminum and Prunus salicina (Verkley et al. 2004, 2014; Damm et al. 2008; Paul and Lee 2014; Nakashima et al. 2019; Tennakoon et al. 2022; this study). Known distribution. Brazil, Canada, China, Japan, Korea, Myanmar, South Africa, and the United States (Verkley et al. 2004, 2014; Damm et al. 2008; Paul and Lee 2014; Nakashima et al. 2019; Tennakoon et al. 2022; this study). Material examined. China • Guangdong Province, Shenzhen, on dead stem of Citrus maxima (Rutaceae), 21 December 2024, D. S. Tennakoon, DC 030 (SZU 25-018, new host record); living culture MBSZU 25-027. Notes. Paraconiothyrium archidendri was initially introduced by Verkley et al. (2014) from Pithecellobium bigeminum in Myanmar. A multi-gene phylogeny indicates that our collection (SZU 25-018) groups with other P. archidendri isolates, particularly closely related to the isolate CBS 168.77. Our collection shares similar morphological characteristics with P. archidendri by having pycnidial, immersed to semi-immersed, dark brown to black conidiomata, globose to doliiform conidiogenous cells, and subglobose to ellipsoid, olivaceous-brown, aseptate conidia (Damm et al. 2008; Paul and Lee 2014; Verkley et al. 2014; Nakashima et al. 2019; Tennakoon et al. 2022). Thus, we identify our collection as Paraconiothyrium archidendri with a new host occurrence from Citrus maxima in China.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping→French-language works237,207→