Trial Construction and Quality Evaluation of Foamed Cement Banking using Waste Glass Cullet
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aimed to promote the recycling of waste glass in the construction industry while enhancing and stabilizing the quality of foamed cement banking (FCB) .As they had proposed previously, the authors conducted indoor mix tests and trial construction of FCB using waste glass cullet (GC-FCB) .The quality of various GC-FCB specimens was assessed using X-ray CT image analysis, and their long-term strengths were evaluated over a period of 1,080 days.Key findings drawn from this study include the following.1) GC-FCB demonstrated superior unconfined compression strength than FCB using natural sand; 2) the unconfined compression strength of GC-FCB was highly dependent on its wet density, making precise wet density control essential during construction; 3) the thickness of a single placed layer of GC-FCB should be limited to no more than 1 m, consistent with standard FCB practices; and 4) the unconfined compression strength of GC-FCB continued to increase for up to 720 days.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".