MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7080774581 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.17086730

Industry Competitiveness 2035: Four scenarios on how emerging technologies will shape the enterprises of the future

2025· article· en· W7080774581 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFutures contractVisionScenario planningContext (archaeology)Futures studiesTransformative learningUnderpinningField (mathematics)Emerging technologies

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This report presents the results of a future-oriented research project exploring the future competitiveness of medium-to-large Italian companies, shaped by artificial intelligence and enabling technologies. Its purpose is to provide both insight and inspiration, offering a structured vision of possible futures and their strategic implications. The document opens with an overview of the research context – the Observatory on Trends and Applications of Supercomputing – in which this study is situated. Next, the theoretical foundations of the study are presented. Drawing from the field of Future Studies, this section clarifies the distinctions between forecasting, foresight, and anticipation, and explains the principles and objectives of strategic foresight. The methodology section follows, detailing the diverse techniques employed to achieve the project’s objectives. The research, that involved a panel of visionary experts, combined horizon scanning with scenario planning, allowing for a comprehensive exploration of trends, uncertainties, and transformative drivers that could shape the future competitive landscape. At the heart of the report are four original future scenarios. Each scenario is carefully crafted and analyzed, highlighting the opportunities and threats it presents. These scenarios offer alternative visions of how medium-to-large Italian companies might evolve, emphasizing the variability and uncertainty of the future while providing actionable insights for decision-makers and other stakeholders. Lastly, strategic insights and surprising or overlooked patterns emerged during the study are included in the conclusive section, pointing out interesting suggestions and ideas that could be further developed. This research is not just an exploration of potential futures—it is a guide for strategic thinking, innovation, and preparedness, equipping Italian companies and innovation ecosystems to navigate the challenges and opportunities of the AI-driven economy of tomorrow.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.072

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0100.008
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0040.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping→French-language works237,207→