MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7081648923 · doi:10.17632/3gbjwd7w3c.1

Identifying marine transgressive-regressive depositional cycles in distal shelf mudstones from the Western Interior Seaway of North America using high-resolution (500 um) chemostratigraphy of the Upper Cretaceous Mancos Shale-Datasets

2025· dataset· en· W7081648923 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMendeley Data · 2025
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSedimentary depositional environmentSiliciclasticFaciesChemostratigraphyCretaceousLithologyOil shaleSedimentary rock

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High-resolution elemental data collected from an Itrax micro-X-ray fluorescence core scanner can be used to develop chemostratigraphic profiles of visually homogeneous mudstones that can potentially be correlated with near-shore facies with much higher accuracy than with lithology and well-log data alone. Our data, which was collected at 0.5-mm sampling resolution from 92 metres of the Upper Cretaceous Mancos Shale from North America, showed transgressive-regressive marine cycles based on siliciclastic input, terrestrial vs marine-dominant sedimentation, and relative redox and organic matter conditions in the sediment at sub-Milankovitch (i.e., millennial scale) frequency; this has not previously been documented in the literature over this length of core. By clustering the data using a hierarchical clustering algorithm known as a Self-Organising Map, we were able to also create detailed chemofacies for every sampling interval to compare the overall elemental signatures in the sediments and describe the depositional environment (prodelta, mudbelt, shelf) and relative proximity to shoreline. The elemental data are presented in total counts of fluoresced X-rays for each element. As the total number of fluoresced X-rays will be dependent on the energy of the incident X-rays as well as the exposure time, both of which are user-defined parameters, the data are semi-quantitative and do not provide information on the absolute amount (e.g., wt.%, ppm, ppb) of any given element. Each folder contains the individual elemental data files, based on core depth in feet below the surface, as tab-separated .txt files (e.g., C15_6557-6561.txt) as well as the accompanying core image (e.g., C15_6557-6561.tif) that is collected by the Itrax at the same time as the elemental data allow for direct comparison. Additionally, the full dataframe containing all intervals (MancosCore_final.csv), the row-wise centred dataframe used in the Self-Organising Map (MancosZ_final.csv), and the clusters (MancosClusters_final.csv) are also included as comma-separated values. For further explanation of the clustering, the reader is referred to the manuscript of the same title in Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Open science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.470
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0060.004
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it