MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7081667573 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.17114837

Repository for the Paper JETROS: A Scalable Robotic Testbed for Experimental Evaluation of Algorithms for Cooperative Vehicle Platooning

2025· other· en· W7081667573 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTestbedModular designScalabilityBackupRobotUploadKey (lock)Collision detectionRobotics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

JETROS is a modular and scalable robotic testbed for experimental evaluation of platooning strategies in autonomous vehicles. Built on the NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano and ROS 2, it integrates a 2D LiDAR, wheel encoders, and an RGB camera to enable perception through neural networks, computer vision, and sensor fusion. Based on a differential drive robot model, the system supports inter-vehicle communication, remote monitoring, and reconfiguration, making it well-suited for studying key challenges such as collision avoidance and spacing control on curved paths. Its extensible architecture enables the development and testing of control and perception algorithms in multi-agent autonomous systems. This repository serves as the backup for the JETROS project at the time of the paper's publication. Subsequent updates to the project will be uploaded to the following repository: https://github.com/FranciscaDB/Platforms/tree/main/JetROS

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.203
Threshold uncertainty score0.680

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2030.116

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping→French-language works237,207→