Bibliographic record
Abstract
The first part of the present book, Noble Families in Lithuania in the 19th Century. Districts of Lida, Oshmiana and Vilnius, appeared in 2016 and covered the materials on the nobility of the Lida, Oshmiana and Vilnius districts (powiats) of the former Vilnius Guberniya. The present volume is devoted to the districts of Sventainy (Polish: Święciany) and Trakai (Polish: Troki). Two more districts remain to be described and published: the districts of Dzisna (Lithuanian: Dysna) and Vilnius. The area of my interest – the former Vilnius Guberniya – in the times of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth covered three provinces: of Vilnius, Trakai and Polotsk, and a small portion of Minsk and Novogrudok provinces. The region came under Russian rule aft er the second and third partitions of the Commonwealth in 1793 and 1795, and remained under the Russian tsars’ power until the First World War. My main subject of interest is the nobility of this region. However, I neither have the possibilities nor sources to study the entire noble community in Lithuania. Thus, I have limited my search to landowning and settled nobility. I am interested in landowners of noble origin and in urban elites, the clergy, the military and students of noble birth. My study gathers information about the noble families living in the former Vilnius Guberniya in the 19th century, indicating the settlement centres where those families and individuals lived.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.052 | 0.020 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".