MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Management of postoperative nausea and vomiting in children: A Systematic Review

2025· article· en· W7081939439 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Carcinogenesis · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPostoperative nausea and vomitingNauseaVomitingMEDLINEComplicationSystematic review

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Compared to adults, pediatric surgical patients are more likely to experience postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), a common and upsetting complication with more severe outcomes. Its occurrence is caused by a number of factors, such as the type of surgery, anesthesia used, opioid use, and personal risk factors. Despite its widespread occurrence, different clinical settings continue to use different management strategies and diagnostic procedures. The goal is to thoroughly examine and assess the methods currently used to prevent and treat PONV in children having surgery. Objective: The goal is to thoroughly examine and assess the methods currently used to prevent and treat PONV in children having surgery. Methods: Using databases such as PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, a systematic review of peer-reviewed literature was carried out between March and July 2025. Included were studies on pharmacological or non-pharmacological treatments for PONV in children ages 0–18. The study's characteristics, interventions, results, and diagnostic instruments were the main topics of data extraction. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool were used to evaluate the quality. Results: A total of 59 studies covering a range of surgical settings and study designs were included, mostly from Asia, North America, and Europe. The prevalence of PONV varied from 18% to 89%, with ENT surgeries having the highest rates. The most prevalent symptoms were nausea and vomiting, which were followed by delayed feeding and drowsiness. Although many studies lacked standardized diagnostic reporting, Rome III/IV criteria were the most commonly reported diagnostic tools. Significant functional effects of PONV included parental work loss, sleep disturbance, and school absence. With differing degrees of success, pharmacologic (such as ondansetron, dexamethasone) and non-pharmacologic (such as acupuncture, ginger) treatments were frequently employed. Conclusion: PONV in children is a common problem with significant social and clinical repercussions. The need for standardized, evidence-based approaches is highlighted by discrepancies in diagnostic criteria and treatment protocols, despite the availability of multiple management strategies. Improving results and patient well-being requires early risk assessment and customized, multimodal preventative measures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.167
Threshold uncertainty score0.221

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it