MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7081969352 · doi:10.1016/j.susmat.2025.e01650

Life cycle analysis of the simultaneous production of lithium hydroxide monohydrate and lithium carbonate from spodumene ore using electrodialysis

2025· article· en· W7081969352 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueSustainable materials and technologies · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersOffice of Energy Research and DevelopmentNatural Resources CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCenovus EnergyAlberta InnovatesCanada Research ChairsEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaSuncor Energy Incorporated
KeywordsSpodumeneLithium hydroxideElectrodialysisLithium carbonateLithium (medication)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The need to combat climate change and to achieve carbon neutrality is driving demand for clean energy technologies, highlighting the importance of sustainable production pathways for lithium-ion battery precursors. Although prior research has assessed greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from lithium hydroxide monohydrate (LHM) production in specific regions, a significant gap remains in the comprehensive life cycle analyses of electrodialysis-based systems co-producing LHM and lithium carbonate across different geographical locations and operational conditions. This study conducts a cradle-to-gate, Canada-specific baseline life cycle assessment (LCA) of flexible LHM and lithium carbonate co-production. It uses an electrodialysis-based electrochemical process, accompanied by detailed modeling of sub-processes to enhance GHG emission reduction by reducing energy consumption. The study also assesses the adaptability and feasibility of the facility under varying geographical and operational conditions. The results indicate that 175.6 Megawatts (MW) of energy is required for a spodumene input capacity of 250 tph. The primary energy consumers are the electrochemical process and mining, at 97.2 MW and 49.6 MW, respectively. Within the electrochemical process, electrolysis consumes 65.7 % of the total energy, representing approximately 36 % of the total energy used in the LHM production process. The study also found that the total life cycle GHG emission is 9.15 t CO 2 e/t LHM. The main contributors to GHG emissions in LHM production are the electrochemical process and mining, contributing 5.48 t CO 2 e/t LHM and 1.85 t CO 2 e/t LHM, respectively. These emissions can be reduced by using the hydrogen by-product from the electrodialysis process and integrating renewable energy into mining, milling, and electrochemical operations. Additionally, small modular nuclear reactors (SMNRs) present a promising low-carbon alternative for powering these stages. The model shows life cycle GHG emissions from 3.91 to 10.97 t CO 2 e/t LHM, mainly influenced by electricity emissions and scalability. Sensitivity analyses confirm its adaptability in different regions and operating conditions. The 0.06 t CO₂e/t LHM GHG emission difference between production ratios of 100 % LHM and 50 % LHM results in 4092 t annually, mainly due to CO₂ injection during carbonation and drying energy use. Overall, increased energy demand is largely offset by CO₂ injection, minimizing net emissions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.453

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it