MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7081977186 · doi:10.5683/sp3/tiw2iu

Replication Data for: Measurements of infrared absorption cross-sections for chloroiodomethane and 2-iodopropane from 305 to 340 K

2025· dataset· en· W7081977186 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueBorealis · 2025
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransmittanceInfraredInfrared spectroscopyAbsorption (acoustics)Spectral lineDispersion (optics)Absorption spectroscopyRange (aeronautics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dataset includes the infrared absorption cross-section measurements used in 'Measurements of infrared absorption cross-sections for chloroiodomethane and 2-iodopropane from 305 to 340 K' by Ishtiak et al. (submitted, 2025). The dataset includes: (1) absorption cross-sections and transmittance spectra for chloroiodomethane (CH2ICl), labeled as CH2ICl; and (2) absorption cross-sections and transmittance spectra for 2-iodopropane ((CH3)2CHI), labeled as (CH3)2CHI. Six absorption cross-sections are provided for each compound, labeled by the sample temperature (305, 320, and 340 K). Three of these cross-sections, labeled as 'H2OLinesRemoved', have H2O lines removed in the range 1200-1535 cm-1. The removal of H2O lines leads to artefacts in the cross-section, and each such artefact covers, at most, 0.3 cm-1. Transmittance data for all pressure-temperature pairs used to generate each cross-section are provided at 305, 320, and 340 K for both chloroiodomethane and 2-iodopropane. Six transmittance datasets are provided for each compound, labeled as 'Transmittance'. Three of these datasets, labeled by 'H2OLinesRemoved', have H2O lines removed in the range 1200-1535 cm-1. As mentioned earlier, removing the H2O lines results in artefacts in the transmittance. All measurements were made using an ABB Bomem DA8 Fourier Transform InfraRed (FTIR) spectrometer. All cross-section files have an uncertainty at 2 standard deviations. The dataset also includes three density functional theory geometry, three unscaled frequency, and three scaled frequency datasets for each compound. The datasets include all conformers of each molecule. These calculations use four density functionals, B3LYP, ωB97X, B2PLYP, and DSD-BLYP with and without the D3 dispersion correction across three basis sets: def2-SVP, def2-TZVPPD, and def2-QZVPPD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.103
Threshold uncertainty score0.343

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1030.118

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBorealis→Same topicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping→French-language works237,207→