MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7082113761

Njivska palamida - Cirsum arvense (L.) Scop.

2013· article· en· W7082113761 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueAgroSpace (University of Belgrade, Faculty of Agriculture) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCirsium arvenseThistleWeedDiggingWeed control
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cirsium arvense is perennial broadleaf weed species, reproducing by seeds and creeping roots. It is one of the most feared weeds in all Serbia and as well as in many countries in Europe and in the world. The noxiousness of the C. arvense is due to its creeping root system, every piece of which can give rise to a new plant, and to the numerous seeds which are easily scattered by the wind and which have a great longevity. The leaves of C. arvense vary greatly in the amount of hairiness, degree of lobing and spininess. Canada thistle species has four varieties based on these variations. It is a common weed of small grain crops, row crops, vegetables, orchards, legumes, roadsides, neglected areas, meadows and pastures. It species high adopted on different environmental conditions (type of soil, nutritions, temperature, moisture) and high competitiveness in relation to many crops. Small patches of Canada thistle should be destroyed promptly by digging out the roots, or by covering with heavy mulch paper. In alfalfa and pastures persistant cutting with a scythe or hoe will gradually reduce the thistle. In many crops except cultivation control is possible with application of many herbicides (clopyralid, metsulfuron- methyl, tribenuron-methyl, etc.).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.754
Threshold uncertainty score0.849

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.174
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAgroSpace (University of Belgrade, Faculty of Agriculture)Same topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207