MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7082663212 · doi:10.35975/apic.v29i6.2897

Comparative effect of preemptive peritonsillar infiltration of ketamine versus dexmedetomidine on postoperative pain in children: a randomized controlled trial

2025· article· en· W7082663212 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueAnaesthesia Pain & Intensive Care · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDexmedetomidinePethidineSalineRandomized controlled trialKetaminePostoperative painPain scale

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives: To assess the efficacy of peritonsillar infiltration of ketamine and dexmedetomidine on controlling post-tonsillectomy pain in children undergoing tonsillectomy. Methodology: This randomized, controlled, double-blind study involved 60 patients aged 5-12 years, both genders, and scheduled for elective tonsillectomy. General anesthesia (GA) was induced in all of the patients. The patients were randomized and divided into three groups. All three groups received a peritonsillar normal saline injection (1 mL for each tonsil). Group I received a saline injection without any additive; Group II with 1 μg/kg of dexmedetomidine, and Group III with 0.5 mg/kg of ketamine. After the anesthesia was over, the time to the first rescue analgesia was noted. The total amount of pethidine consumed, the time to start oral intake, and the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (CHEOPS) scores were noted at 30 min and 1, 2, and 4 hours postoperatively. Results: The time of 1st rescue analgesia was significantly prolonged in group II than group I and III (P1 < 0.001, P3 < 0.001, respectively) and in Group III than Group I (P2 = 0.011). The total amount of pethidine consumed by Group II and the time for starting oral intake were significantly lower in Group II (P < 0.001) and were insignificantly different between Groups I and III. Compared to Groups I and III, Group II had significantly lower Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (CHEOPS) scores at 30 min and 1, 2, and 4 hours postoperatively (P < 0.05). In terms of postoperative complications, none of the three groups differed significantly (P > 0.05). There was no significant variation in the dosage of metoclopramide among the three groups. Conclusion: Compared to placebo, dexmedetomidine and ketamine infiltrated into the tonsils reduced postoperative pain more effectively. Dexmedetomidine also improved pain scores according to the CHEOPS scale at different postoperative time points and reduced the need for additional analgesics more effectively than ketamine. Abbreviations: CHEOPS: Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale, GA: General anesthesia, NMDA: N-methyl-D-aspartate, PACU: post-anesthesia care unit Keywords: Anesthesia; Anaesthesia, General; Dexmedetomidine; Preemptive Analgesia; Peritonsillar Infiltration; Ketamine; Postoperative Pain; Tonsillectomy Citation: Eloraby M, Ghoneem H, ElgoharyM, Ebrahim N.Comparative effect of preemptive peritonsillar infiltration of ketamine versus dexmedetomidine on postoperative pain in children: a randomized controlled trial, Anaesth. pain intensive care 2025;29(6):497-504; DOI: 10.35975/apic.v29i6.2897 Received: February 04, 2025; Revised: July 09, 2025; Accepted: July 09, 2025

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnaesthesia Pain & Intensive CareSame topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207