MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7083171088 · doi:10.1158/2326-6074.cimm25-a005

Abstract A005: TAZ-TEAD signaling alters the immune microenvironment of cutaneous melanoma

2025· article· en· W7083171088 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Immunology Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHippo pathway signaling and YAP/TAZ
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMelanomaImmune checkpointImmune systemTumor microenvironmentDownregulation and upregulationImmunotherapyGalectin-1GalectinTranscription factor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Current standard of care treatment for late-stage cutaneous melanoma is immune checkpoint blockade (ICB); however, about ∼50% of patients progress after treatment and mechanisms underlying resistance are actively being investigated. For example, an invasive, mesenchymal-like cell state, often characterized by low expression of SOX10, is associated with cross resistance to ICB and MAPK targeted therapy (TT). Tumors with low levels of SOX10, a melanocyte lineage specific transcription factor, exhibit enhanced activation of the YAP/TAZ-TEAD signaling pathway. YAP and TAZ are downstream transcriptional co-activators in the Hippo signaling pathway that interact with TEAD transcription factors to promote expression of genes that control cell proliferation, survival and drug resistance. Small molecule TEAD inhibitors (TEADi) have been tested in various clinical trials, but their effect in melanoma has not been evaluated. Melanoma cells with high TEAD activity have upregulated expression of immune checkpoint molecule PD-L1 and depletion of TAZ, not YAP, in these cells significantly upregulates expression of immune-modulatory molecules including galectin 9, galectin 3 and OX40L. Given that TAZ-TEAD signaling has been associated with TT resistance in melanoma, we want to investigate the role of TAZ-TEAD in the melanoma immune microenvironment and evaluate its relevance in the context of ICB resistance. Preliminary in vivo analysis of tumors treated short-term with TEADi (VT103) revealed changes in the immune microenvironment, including upregulation of galectin 9 and MHC-I on tumor cells and enhanced recruitment of CD4+ T cells. Together, these data imply there is TAZ-TEAD dependent regulation of immune-modulatory molecules in the microenvironment, suggesting that targeting TEADs may enhance sensitivity of tumors to ICB. Future directions include in vivo studies to determine if active TAZ is sufficient to mediate ICB resistance and whether TEADi enhances efficacy of ICB. Citation Format: Kristen M. DeRosa, Andrew Aplin, Timothy Purwin, Dan Erkes, Manoela Tiago. TAZ-TEAD signaling alters the immune microenvironment of cutaneous melanoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Mechanisms of Cancer Immunity and Cancer-related Autoimmunity; 2025 Sep 24-27; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2025;13(9 Suppl):Abstract nr A005.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.556

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Immunology ResearchSame topicHippo pathway signaling and YAP/TAZFrench-language works237,207