MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7083288621 · doi:10.18280/ijsdp.200825

The Impact of Macroeconomic Factors on Financial Stability: Evidence from OECD Countries

2025· article· en· W7083288621 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic, Social, and Health Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterest rateEconomic impact analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Financial stability is an essential element for economic stability, especially in OECD member countries, which face ongoing macroeconomic challenges.This study aims to analyze the impact of macroeconomic factors on the financial stability of 27 OECD countries during the period 2008-2023.The data were obtained from the World Bank and include annual figures for indicators such as GDP, inflation, interest rates, exchange rates, unemployment, and nonperforming loans (NPLs).Financial stability in this paper is measured through the banks' Zscore, while the econometric analyses applied include the Fixed Effects Model (FEM), Random Effects Model (REM), and Panel Corrected Standard Errors (PCSE) -with the latter identified as the most suitable for interpreting the results.The results reveal that Gross Domestic Product (GDP) has a positive effect on financial stability (β = 0.256); however, this relationship is not statistically significant (p > 0.05).The exchange rate demonstrates a positive and statistically significant effect (β = 0.031, p < 0.05), indicating that currency fluctuations are associated with improved financial stability.In contrast, inflation (β = -0.073,p < 0.01) and unemployment (β = -0.242,p < 0.05) exert negative and statistically significant effects, implying that worsening macroeconomic conditions substantially weaken financial stability.The non-performing loans (NPL) ratio also displays a negative effect (β = -0.008),though this result is not statistically significant (p = 0.914, p > 0.05).Lastly, the interest rate shows a positive and statistically significant coefficient (β = 0.110, p < 0.05), suggesting a counterintuitive relationship that deviates from theoretical expectations.The findings underscore the critical role of macroeconomic stability in ensuring financial stability.This study contributes to the existing literature by demonstrating that sound and prudent economic policies can substantially enhance financial stability in developed economies, particularly those within the OECD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.090

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and PlanningSame topicEconomic, Social, and Health StudiesFrench-language works237,207