MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7083288890 · doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2025.102808

Me and the world: A methodological exploration of university students’ perspectives on global issues through cellphilms

2025· article· en· W7083288890 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Educational Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgency (philosophy)Global citizenshipGlobal educationCitizen journalismGlobal warmingScale (ratio)Global climateGlobal South

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

University students in the 2020s – Generation Z – have grown up with technology and seen the world shrink around them. They have been exposed to global issues on a scale and with a frequency that is unprecedented. However, except in relation to the climate crisis, there is little in the literature to help understand Gen Z students’ perspectives on global issues. This article reports on a pilot study of visual participatory methods workshops about global issues with 50 students at two universities in Kazakhstan. Students in Kazakhstan have diverse positionalities, which was the starting point to explore their perspectives on global issues. Spatially, they are within the geography of the ex-Soviet space but connected to the world; temporally, they are one of the first generations never to have experienced Soviet rule firsthand yet who continue to live with its imprints. Nevertheless, the issues that most concern Kazakhstani students are similar to those of their global peers: war and conflict, and environmental issues. Students made cellphilms (short informational videos) about pollution, global warming, vandalism, cyber fraud, corruption, ethnic discrimination, and gender inequality. The process of cellphilming helped students think through global issues as they relate to their local environments. Visual participatory methods offer important opportunities for students not only to make sense of global issues but also to contend with the anxieties and concerns that these global issues present. Students’ agency could be increased through using participatory visual methods, responsibly incorporating social media in the classroom, and through open discussion on global issues.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.019
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.099

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0190.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.004
Science and technology studies0.0160.018
Scholarly communication0.0100.008
Open science0.0030.017
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.215
GPT teacher head0.508
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Educational ResearchSame topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207