RETRACTED: Corrigendum to ‘Integrated petrophysical characterization of Late Cretaceous fluvial-deltaic channel systems in Penobscot Field, Nova Scotia: Implications for reservoir facies prediction’ [Journal of Applied Geophysics, 242 (2025)/105877]
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame — the usual design — would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
Post-publication record
OpenAlex flags this work as retracted, but it carries no matching Retraction Watch record in this frame.
Machine scores (provisional)
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
- Teacher spread
- 0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
- Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline· verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
Abstract
This retraction has been requested by the Editor-In-Chief. The article to which this corrigendum refers has been retracted and the journal is, therefore, also retracting the corrigendum.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
The record
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Geophysics
- Topic
- Geological formations and processes
- Field
- Earth and Planetary Sciences
- Canadian institutions
- —
- Funders
- —
- Keywords
- PetrophysicsFaciesCretaceousChannel (broadcasting)Reservoir modeling
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- yes