35-36 Hallgate, Doncaster, South Yorkshire: Archaeological Desk-Based Assessment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The desk-based assessment was requested in relation to the planned redevelopment of the site and comprised historical and cartographic research, along with a site visit. The specific aims are: * to assess the survival and potential significance of buried archaeological remains within the application area; * to assess the historic significance of the standing buildings; * to assess the extent of impact likely to be caused by the proposed development. Roman, medieval and early-post-medieval activity is known to have occurred within the immediate vicinity of the proposal area although the site itself remained undeveloped until the construction of South Parade House during the second quarter of the 19th century. The Majestic Cinema occupied the site by 1923 but, by 1934, this had been replaced by the Gaumont Palace. The building has many aspects of architectural merit but has been heavily altered, including both the external entrance facade and the internal layout. Fragmentary elements of the original design do remain and the backstage (non-public) areas still retain their historic character, albeit with little ornamentation. The impact of the deep basements along the south and north sides of the building and the ground reduction in the auditorium area of the site will have had a severe impact upon earlier archaeological deposits or structures. Given the depths at which sub-surface archaeological deposits associated with the Roman period have been recovered from the Hallgate area, the potential exists for archaeological deposits to survive within the site. The archaeological potential may be greater within the alley at the west of the site, as ground levels within this area were not truncated during the construction of the cinema.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.097 | 0.013 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".