MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7083454209 · doi:10.1109/tcsi.2025.3611874

Noise Reduction in Charge-Sensitive Amplifiers for X-Ray Imagers With Large Line Capacitance

2025· article· en· W7083454209 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Regular Papers · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, Psychology, and Social Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaPetrochemical Research and Technology Company
KeywordsParasitic capacitanceLinearityCapacitanceNoise (video)AmplifierCMOSNoise reductionNoise figureChip

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Substantial parasitic data-line capacitance <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$C_{p}$</tex-math> </inline-formula> in thin-film-transistor-based active-matrix flat-panel X-ray imagers limits the noise performance, bandwidth, and linearity of the analog front-end (AFE) integrated circuit, normally comprised of a charge-sensitive amplifier (CSA) to process pC-level input signals, followed by a lowpass filter. To mitigate the adverse effect of <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$C_{p}$</tex-math> </inline-formula> on noise, we develop and implement, for the first time for X-ray-imager AFEs, two techniques based on introducing a low-noise auxiliary amplifier (AUX) to the AFE that improves noise performance without a significant increase in power consumption. In the first technique, we design the AUX to introduce a negative capacitance that neutralizes <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$C_{p}$</tex-math> </inline-formula>. In the second, we design the AUX to provide a feedforward path around the CSA that cancels the CSA noise. In both approaches, the AUX determines the overall AFE noise performance, allowing the CSA to be designed to meet relaxed bandwidth, gain error, and linearity specifications. To demonstrate the performance of our proposed noise-reduction techniques, we present our design and experimental characterization of a single-channel AFE in a 1.8-V-supply 180-nm mixed-signal CMOS technology. Experimental results from our prototype chip indicate that both methods provide at least <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$2.2\times $</tex-math> </inline-formula> reduction in input-referred noise at the cost of no more than a 29% increase in static-power consumption compared to a conventional AFE.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.434
Threshold uncertainty score0.733

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Regular PapersSame topicEducation, Psychology, and Social ResearchFrench-language works237,207