MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7083632966 · doi:10.33271/mining19.03.106

Research on the stability of mine workings and the risk of rock caving at the Zhaysan deposit, Kazakhstan

2025· article· en· W7083632966 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMining of Mineral Deposits · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCraniofacial Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRock mass classificationRockfallTectonicsStability (learning theory)FragilityRock mechanicsGeological Strength Index

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose. This research aims to predict the stability of mine workings and assess the risk of rockbursts in conditions of insufficient knowledge of the mechanical rock properties at the Zhaysan deposit (Kazakhstan), while taking into account the depth of the rock mass occurrence and quality, as well as the orientation of the mine workings relative to the tectonic stress field. Methods. The research employs a set of methods: laboratory testing of granitoid and diabase samples, assessment of rock mass disturbance using the Rock Quality Designation (RQD) index, analysis of metasomatically altered rocks, as well as the construction of a simplified 3D geomechanical model using the kriging method. The rock mass strength was predicted using the Hoek-Brown criterion, while the risk of rockbursts was assessed using the Fragility Index (UCS/UTS) and the Canadian method for assessing rockburst potential. The stability of mine workings in different directions was determined by the indicator of weighted frequency of rockfalls and analysis of their ratio with respect to orientation relative to σ1. Findings. It has been found that with increasing depth, the average RQD values increase from 60 to 90%, reflecting a decrease in fracturing and an improvement in rock mass quality. However, in fresh granitoids, there remains a high risk of elastic energy accumulation and its release during destruction. The critical depth at which rockburst risk begins has been determined to be approximately 400 m. The rocks altered metasomatically are characterized by reduced strength and fragility, which reduces their susceptibility to bursts, but increases the probability of caving. It has been revealed that the stability of the mine workings depends on their orientation: minimal damage is fixed when coinciding with the direction σ1 (azimuth ~300°), and the critical is the angle of intersection 45°, after which the volumes of rockfalls increase sharply. Originality. For the first time for the Zhaysan deposit, laboratory tests, geomechanical parameters (RQD, GSI), analytical strength criteria and analysis of the orientation of mine workings relative to the tectonic stress field were integrated to determine the depth boundary of rockburst hazard occurrence. The necessity of distinguishing between fresh and metasomatically altered granitoids is demonstrated when assessing risks and taking into account the direction of mine workings in project solutions. Practical implications. The results make it possible to identify high danger zones and depths, starting from which an enhanced monitoring of the stress state of the rock mass and the application of special safety measures are required. The proposed approach can be tailored for similar solid mineral deposits with limited source data, as well as can be used when selecting a safe direction for mine workings in the tectonic stress field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.144
Threshold uncertainty score0.223

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it