MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7083708993 · doi:10.7860/jcdr/2025/80478.21751

The Impact of Different tDCS Intensities on Higher Mental Function in the Elderly Population with Cognitive Impairment: A Pilot Study

2025· article· en· W7083708993 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCognitionTranscranial direct-current stimulationPopulationMontreal Cognitive AssessmentEffects of sleep deprivation on cognitive performanceExecutive functionsCognitive declineDorsolateral prefrontal cortex

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Cognitive decline in the geriatric population significantly impacts higher mental functions, such as memory, executive skills, and decision-making, which are essential for daily life and mental well-being. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS), a noninvasive and low-risk neuromodulation technique, has demonstrated the potential in improving cognitive performance by modulating cortical excitability in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Despite its growing use, the optimal tDCS intensity for enhancing higher mental functions in elderly individuals with cognitive impairment has not been established. Aim: To evaluate the effects of varying tDCS intensities on higher mental functions in the geriatric population with cognitive impairment. Materials and Methods: This pilot study recruited participants based on specific inclusion criteria. Subjects were randomised into four groups: Group 1 received 0.5 mA, Group 2 received 1 mA, Group 3 received 1.5 mA, and Group 4 received 2 mA of tDCS targeting the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Each session lasted 20 minutes and was conducted five days a week for six consecutive weeks. Cognitive performance was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA) before and after the intervention. Statistical analysis included the Shapiro-Wilk test for normality, with parametric or non-parametric tests applied based on data distribution. Results: The study observed a dose-dependent improvement in cognitive performance, with Groups 3 (1.5 mA) and 4 (2 mA) showing significant enhancements in MoCA scores compared to Groups 1 (0.5 mA) and 2 (1 mA). Statistical tests confirmed that higher intensities of tDCS resulted in greater improvements in higher mental functions. Conclusion: This pilot study highlights the effectiveness of higher tDCS intensities (1.5 and 2 mA) in improving higher mental functions in the geriatric population with cognitive impairment. These findings provide a foundation for optimising tDCS protocols in geriatric cognitive rehabilitation and call for further large-scale studies to confirm these results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.431

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.124
GPT teacher head0.444
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCHSame topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207