MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7083810810 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.17236285

Phaseolus augusti Harms 1921

2021· article· en· W7083810810 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Analysis with R
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhaseolusPopulationLima beansEpithetFlannerySpelling

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Phaseolus augusti Harms (1921: 503) [clade B; sect. Paniculati Freytag]. TYPE: A Weberbauer 6439 (HOLOTYPE: B n.v.; ISOTYPES: G, GH-64117, MOL, US-1496218). The type was probably lost in Berlin during WWII; while the isotype at G consists only of fragments, the other three are complete blooming specimens. If there is any need (see Turland 2013, p. 64 and following), on the basis of the number of flowering racemes, the author wishes to indicate: “ Neotype designated here: A Weberbauer 6439 (GH-64117)”. Using this specimen and the specimen US-1058964 (= the type of Phaseolus bolivianus Piper), the author fully endorses the synonymy of the latter with P. augusti proposed by James Zarucchi and Alfonso Delgado-Salinas (1993, p. 508). Incidentally, it is quite strange that Charles Vancouver Piper (1926) did not mention P.augusti (thus creating a need for P.bolivianus) while he mentioned P.pachyrrhizoides (with one “r,” p. 700). The original population of P.bolivianus is probably gone by now due to the expanding city of Cochabamba; an alternative could be the population found NW of Quillacollo DG Debouck 3000 (DAV-167638, MO-5613159, NY) (Freyre et al. 1996). Along recommendation 60C.2 of the Code (McNeill et al. 2012, p. 134), the spelling of the current termination of the epithet can be used. Phaseolus augusti is a species well distributed in the Andes in alder seasonal forest at 1400–3200 m, related to the Andean form of wild P. lunatus (Delgado-Salinas et al. 2006; Serrano-Serrano et al. 2010), and thus included into the Paniculati where the Lima bean is the reference species (Fig. 10). Specimens: ECUADOR. Azuay: DG Debouck 2764 (QCA). Loja: L Ellemann 91733 (K). PERU. Piura: DG Debouck 2816 (COL-332611). Cajamarca: N Angulo 1609 (F-1746428). La Libertad: S Leiva 453 (HAO-3037). Huánuco: C Ochoa 1085 (MOL). Junín: DG Debouck 2146 (UC-1571124). Apurimac: C Vargas 8858 (CUZ-7418). Huancavelica: O Tovar 1919 (US-2490509). Cuzco: E Petersen 1535 (LIL-410643). Puno: J Soukup 726 (CUZ-7417). BOLIVIA. La Paz: SG Beck 8659 (BAB). Cochabamba: DG Debouck 2483 (UC-1716208). Norcinti: DG Debouck 2504 (LPB). Chuquisaca: DG Debouck 2490 (LPB). Tarija: JRI Wood 9539 (K). ARGENTINA. Jujuy: A Burkart 11591 (SI). Salta: DG Debouck 1774 (BAA). Tucumán: R Fortunato 3565 (BAB). Catamarca: M Cerana 318 (CORD).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicData Analysis with RFrench-language works237,207