MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Neuro-Headstage with On-Chip Machine Learning and Wireless Charging for Closed-Loop Neurobiological Applications

2025· article· en· W7084050434 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicForensic Entomology and Diptera Studies
Canadian institutionsGrain Research CentreUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOptogeneticsWirelessBrain stimulationCMOSArtificial neural networkEpilepsyBrain–computer interfaceLocal field potential

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a novel wireless electrooptic headstage for long-term, autonomous neurobiological experiments. The system features a custom mixed-signal SoC, fabricated in <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$0.13-\mu \mathrm{m}$</tex> CMOS technology, and enables lowlatency closed-loop neural stimulation (<tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\leq 0.6 ~\text{ms}$</tex>) triggered by complex neural firing patterns. A wireless inductive power link supports continuous operation in freely moving models without frequent recharging. At its core, the Adaptive Autonomous Neural Integrated Circuit (AANIC) provides dual site optogenetic stimulation and multi-unit electrophysiology recording (10 channels), allowing simultaneous stimulation and recording across brain regions. The system offers a tunable bandwidth <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$(1-6500 ~\text{Hz})$</tex> and high-fidelity signal processing, achieving an ENOB of 8.68 with a Delta-Sigma converter at an OSR of 25. In vivo tests demonstrate successful seizure suppression in a mouse model of temporal lobe epilepsy via closed-loop activation of ChR2-expressing inhibitory interneurons. In addition, wireless charging functionality was validated in freely moving mice, marking a step toward chronic studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.311
Threshold uncertainty score0.343

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicForensic Entomology and Diptera StudiesFrench-language works237,207