A SYSTEMATIC METHODOLOGY TO DESIGN SOFT MACHINES BASED ON TOPOLOGY OPTIMIZATION
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Soft systems, defined by their soft bodies and ability to undergo large deformations, offer advantages in adaptability, safety, and resilience compared to their rigid counterparts. In this dissertation the term soft machine is used in the title to reflect the broader category of soft-bodied systems. However, the term soft robot is employed throughout the text to remain consistent with common terminology in the field. In most soft robots, the body and actuator are inherently integrated, often forming a single deformable system. A major challenge in the design of such soft systems is the absence of a systematic, principle-based methodology that considers the predefined design requirements. Current designs are often driven by biological inspiration and personal intuition, rather than structured approaches grounded in physics and engineering. This dissertation addresses the identified knowledge gaps by proposing a top-down, principle-based design methodology for soft systems. The methodology begins by translating customer needs into a technical specification of design requirements and then proceeds through a structured sequence of concept design, embodiment design, and detailed design. It leverages common soft building blocks, such as bellows and air chambers, and incorporates a nonlinear finite element method (FEM) framework capable of creating mathematical models and capturing large deformations. Genetic algorithm, as an evolutionary algorithm, is employed to automate design exploration and optimize the topology and actuation of soft system. The developed methodology is applied to design a soft finger for a gripping application, achieving 5 cm of tip deformation using soft components. Bellows and air chambers serve as the fundamental building blocks in the design. Verification is conducted through both numerical simulations using commercial FEM software (ANSYS) and experimental testing via physical prototyping. In a verification case involving five bellows, the proposed method demonstrated small relative error compared to ANSYS simulations. In the case study, measurements from the physical prototype demonstrated strong agreement between the experimental and simulation results. The methodology also automates the identification of active versus passive actuation states, reducing the reliance on designer intuition during the concept design phase. A key conclusion is that the proposed methodology enables systematic, principle-based design of soft robots, moving beyond the bio-mimicking approaches. By representing the underlying principles of biological organisms through engineering building blocks, the methodology facilitates their integration into a general, rational, and structured design process. Furthermore, the case study confirms the feasibility, functionality, and accuracy of the proposed approach in designing real-world soft systems. This dissertation contributes to the field of soft robotics by providing a comprehensive design framework that begins with the specification of design requirements and supports a logical and methodical development process. It is also worth noting that the proposed methodology has the potential to complement and integrate existing biomimetic design approaches found in the literature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".