MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7084314568

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Multidrug-Resistant Organism Infections in Infected Pancreatic Necrosis: A Post-Hoc Cohort Analysis

2025· article· en· W7084314568 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcne and Rosacea Treatments and Effects
Canadian institutionsPancreas Centre (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPandemicIncidence (geometry)Logistic regressionAntimicrobialCohortCohort study
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Baiqi Liu,1– 4 Caihong Ning,1– 4 Jiarong Li,1– 4 Zefang Sun,1– 4 Chiayen Lin,1– 4 Xiaoyue Hong,1– 4 Rong Guo,1– 4 Lu Chen,1– 4 Dingcheng Shen,1– 4 Gengwen Huang1– 4 1Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, People’s Republic of China; 3National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, People’s Republic of China; 4FuRong Laboratory, Changsha, Hunan, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Gengwen Huang, Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, People’s Republic of China, Email huanggengwen@csu.edu.cnBackground: This study aimed to elucidate the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) infection in patients with infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN).Methods: This post-hoc analysis of a prospective cohort included patients with IPN stratified into three phases: pre-pandemic (2016– 2019), pandemic period (2020– 2022), and post-pandemic period (2023– 2024). Logistic regression and interrupted time-series analysis (ITSA) were employed to identify risk factors and longitudinal trends.Results: MDRO infection decreased significantly during the pandemic period compared to pre-pandemic levels (44.8% vs 81.1%, P< 0.001). There was no significant difference in the incidence of MDRO infection between the pandemic and post-pandemic period (44.1% vs 44.8%, P=0.924). During the pandemic, both prophylactic antimicrobial usage (64.8% vs 85.1%, P< 0.001) and ICU stays (median: 6.0 vs 15.0 days, P< 0.001) were significantly reduced compared to the pre-pandemic period. Logistic regression identified prophylactic antimicrobial usage (OR 17.28, P< 0.001), ICU stays (OR 1.07, P< 0.001), and the COVID-19 pandemic (OR 0.21, P< 0.001) as independent factors associated with MDRO infection. ITSA revealed a significant decrease in the trend of MDRO infection during the pandemic compared to the pre-pandemic period (P=0.006). An immediate level of MDRO infection increased during the post-pandemic period compared to the pandemic (P=0.040). The similar trend variations were observed in the proportion of prophylactic antimicrobial usage.Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a notable reduction in MDRO infection among IPN patients, likely attributable to stringent infection prevention and control measures which led to reduced prophylactic antimicrobial usage and ICU stays during this period.Keywords: antimicrobial resistance, acute pancreatitis, COVID-19, antimicrobial usage, interrupted time-series analysis

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.004
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.118
GPT teacher head0.542
Teacher spread0.424 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicAcne and Rosacea Treatments and EffectsFrench-language works237,207