MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7084388089 · doi:10.7910/dvn/6kg67m

Replication Data for: "The Origin of the State: Land Productivity or Appropriability? Comment"

2025· dataset· en· W7084388089 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueHarvard Dataverse · 2025
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAntibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
Canadian institutionsBank of CanadaWilfrid Laurier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReplication (statistics)ProductivityLand useAgricultural productivity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This is the replication package for "The Origin of the State: Land Productivity or Appropriability? Comment," accepted in 2025 by the Journal of Political Economy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.021
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.157
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Reproducibility · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.979
Threshold uncertainty score0.932

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0210.157
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.005
Bibliometrics0.0030.008
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0050.005
Research integrity0.0060.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3470.178

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
DomainReproducibility
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHarvard DataverseSame topicAntibiotics Pharmacokinetics and EfficacyFrench-language works237,207