MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7084389699 · doi:10.15468/dl.4fyv7e

Occurrence Download

2025· dataset· en· W7084389699 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility · 2025
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEcology, Conservation, and Geographical Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDownloadSAINTRange (aeronautics)State (computer science)Matching (statistics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A dataset containing 26130 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query: { "and" : [ "TaxonKey is one of (Cedrela odorata, Otoba parvifolia, Cedrelinga cateniformis, Ochroma pyramidale)", "Country is one of (Canada, United States of America, Mexico, Bermuda, Greenland, Belize, Guatemala, El Salvador, Honduras, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Panama, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Haiti, Puerto Rico, Jamaica, Trinidad and Tobago, Bahamas, Barbados, Grenada, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Dominica, Antigua and Barbuda, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Aruba, Curaçao, Sint Maarten (Dutch part), Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba, Guadeloupe, Martinique, Virgin Islands (British), Virgin Islands (U.S.), Anguilla, Montserrat, Cayman Islands, Turks and Caicos Islands, Colombia, Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of), Guyana, Suriname, French Guiana, Ecuador, Peru, Bolivia (Plurinational State of), Brazil, Paraguay, Uruguay, Argentina, Chile, Falkland Islands (Malvinas))", "BasisOfRecord is one of (Specimen, Literature Occurrence, Human Observation, Observation)", "HasCoordinate is true", "HasGeospatialIssue is false", "Year is greater than or equal to 1950", "Year is less than or equal to 2025" ] } The dataset includes 26130 records from 488 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0041779-250920141307145/datasets/export for details. Data from some individual datasets included in this download may be licensed under less restrictive terms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.089
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.057

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobal Biodiversity Information FacilitySame topicEcology, Conservation, and Geographical StudiesFrench-language works237,207