MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7084404773 · doi:10.53731/ma46p-xre36

Nine simple ways to make it easier to (re)use your data

2013· article· en· W7084404773 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDirectorate for Education and Human ResourcesMinistry of Education, IndiaEcological Society of AmericaResources for the FutureWorld Wildlife FundConsortium of Universities for the Advancement of Hydrologic ScienceUniversity of MiamiU.S. Department of AgricultureU.S. Geological SurveyCanada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of CanadaU.S. Department of EnergyU.S. Department of DefenseNational Science Foundation
KeywordsSimple (philosophy)Data sharingKey (lock)StatisticianContext (archaeology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Sharing data is increasingly considered to be an important part of the scientific process. Making your data publicly available allows original results to be reproduced and new analyses to be conducted. While sharing your data is the first step in allowing reuse, it is also important that the data be easy to understand and use.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.123
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.348
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Open science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Reproducibility · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.994
Threshold uncertainty score0.648

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1230.348
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.007
Bibliometrics0.0120.009
Science and technology studies0.0050.005
Scholarly communication0.0150.021
Open science0.0060.016
Research integrity0.0060.016
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0800.056

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.134
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
DomainReproducibility
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBacterial Identification and Susceptibility TestingFrench-language works237,207