MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7084589581 · doi:10.5284/1136614

Evaluation at Land north of Middleton Road, Pickering, North Yorkshire

2024· article· en· W7084589581 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueArchaeology Data Service · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Teacher Training
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExcavationTrenchPrehistoryGeoarchaeologyHorizonScarcityNova scotiaArchaeological evidence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An Archaeological Evaluation by Trial Trenching as undertaken by MAP Archaeological Practice Ltd., on land north of Middleton Road, Pickering, North Yorkshire in October 2024. The evaluation was undertaken to inform North Yorkshire Council and the client of the archaeological potential of the site and to allow a reasoned decision to be made regarding the need for further archaeological work, in advance of residential development. The site had previously been the subject of a Desk Based Assessment and Geophysical Survey, the latter of which identified features of likely archaeological origin within the south-western corner. The positions of all trenches were located using a Trimble GPS Rover and the trench area scanned for underground services. Trenches 1-5 & 7-17 measured 40m by 2m and Trench 6 measured 15m by 15m. Once positioned the trenches were excavated using a tracked 360� mechanical excavator, fitted with a wide toothless bucket operating under close archaeological supervision. In each trench, soils were removed down to archaeologically perceived natural horizon and subsequently the exposed surfaces were cleaned, photographed and recorded. All excavation and recording were carried out in line with the approved Written Scheme of Investigation Seventeen Trial Trenches were excavated across the site, most of which contained medieval or post-medieval agricultural features including furrows. Features deemed to be of archaeological origin were identified in five trenches and largely correlated with the results of the Geophysical Survey. Excavated features are likely to relate to an enclosure of late prehistoric or Romano-British date which, given the scarcity of finds and associated features, is likely to be agricultural in nature and may be concerned with the control of livestock. The evaluation was undertaken to inform North Yorkshire Council and the client of the archaeological potential of the site and to allow a reasoned decision to be made regarding the need for further archaeological work, in advance of residential development. Further archaeological work may be required if planning permsissoion granted

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.650
Threshold uncertainty score0.989

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.187
GPT teacher head0.395
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchaeology Data ServiceSame topicEducation and Teacher TrainingFrench-language works237,207