Distinct thermal regimes drive contrasting heatwave responses in alpine and montane peatlands of the Canadian Rockies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study assesses how peatlands situated at elevational extremes of their Canadian Rocky Mountain range differ in thermal dynamics and vulnerability to temperature extremes, using in situ data collected before, during and after the record-breaking 2021 heatwave. The study sites include Helen fen (High site), (2365 m, 1.2 ha, 51°40’59.98”N, 116°24’32.9”W), situated above tree line, and Sibbald fen (Low Site) (1480 m, 130 ha, 51°03’29.38” N, 114°52’11.66” W), located in the montane zone. Environmental data for these sites is provided. Study period September 2019 to March 2022. No recording indicated by NA. Datasets: HelTempsWT2019-2022 and SibbTempsWT2019-2022 Time: Timestamp of measurement (DD/MM/YYYY HH:MM) AirTempC: Air temperature measured in °C every 15 minutes in Helen, every 30 minutes in Sibbald. WT_m: Soil water table depth from data logger in m, measured hourly. T_5cm – 70cm: Soil temperature at 5, 10, 20, 30, and 40 cm depth (°C) at Helen, plus 40, 50, 50, 70 at Sibbald, measured hourly. NR_W_m2: Net radiation (W m⁻²), every 15 minutes in Helen, every 30 minutes in Sibbald.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.027 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".