MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7084759723 · doi:10.82161/fm2y-zr79

Effect of Neurodevelopmental treatment on function and participation of children with Spastic Diplegic Cerebral Palsy

2025· other· en· W7084759723 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Physiotherapy Congress Archive · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCerebral palsyActivities of daily livingGoal Attainment ScalingQuality of life (healthcare)SpasticBalance (ability)Gross Motor Function Classification SystemFunctional Independence Measure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study focused on analyzing the effect of NDT on the function and participation of a child with spastic Diplegic Cerebral Palsy. NDT can be used as an active approach and with proper facilitation, carry-over at home, parent involvement, and looking at function from a participatory perspective. Changes can be expected in all domains of ICF thereby enhancing the quality of life of an individual with Cerebral Palsy and also their families. 25 children with Spastic diplegic cerebral palsy with GMFCS level I-III, CFCS level I-III, EDACS level I-III, and VFCS level I-III were enrolled at Latika Roy Memorial Foundation, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India. A baseline assessment was done using the Gross motor function measure (GMFM) 66, the Functional independence measure (WeeFim), the Goal attainment scale (GAS), and the pediatric balance scale. Outcome measures used to analyze participation were the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) and Child Engagement in daily life measures. The group underwent a 10-week intervention program based on NDT. Pre and post-intervention data was analyzed. The results post-intervention showed positive outcomes indicating that NDT can be useful for improving the function and participation of children with cerebral palsy. The performance and satisfaction levels of participants improved as per COPM. There was an improvement in the participation of the children as per Child engagement in daily life measure. The Weefim scores, GMFM 66 total increased. GAS scores and balance scores of PBS were achieved and showed positive improvement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.113
Threshold uncertainty score0.951

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Physiotherapy Congress ArchiveSame topicAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton DynamicsFrench-language works237,207