MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7084771492

ApneaWhisper: Transformer-Based Audio Segmentation for Fine-Grained Non-Invasive Sleep Apnea Detection

2025· article· en· W7084771492 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSleep apneaSegmentationSleep (system call)EncoderApnea
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Yunu Kim,1 Myeongbin Kim,1 Jaemyung Shin,2 Minsam Ko1 1Department of Applied Artificial Intelligence, Hanyang University ERICA, Ansan, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea; 2DelightRoom, Seoul, Republic of KoreaCorrespondence: Minsam Ko, Hanyang University ERICA, Ansan, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea, Email minsam@hanyang.ac.krPurpose: Sleep apnea is a prevalent sleep disorder with serious health implications. This study introduces ApneaWhisper, a Transformer-based audio segmentation model designed for noninvasive detection of sleep apnea subtypes using PSG-Audio data.Patients and Methods: We utilized a PSG-Audio dataset from 284 patients. ApneaWhisper leverages a pretrained Whisper encoder to extract 10 ms-resolution frame-level features from 20-second audio clips. A lightweight Transformer decoder with token-based segmentation and a classification head aggregates these features for both frame-level and clip-level predictions. The model was fine-tuned using class-balanced cross-entropy loss to address data imbalance across apnea subtypes.Results: ApneaWhisper achieved strong performance for sleep apnea detection, with a clip-level F1-score of 0.82 and a frame-level F1-score of 0.70, outperforming conventional baselines including MFCC+DNN, VGGish+bi-LSTM, and VAD-based models. It also showed promising ability in distinguishing between OSA, MSA, CSA, and hypopnea, though with varying success.Conclusion: The model’s fine-grained temporal resolution enables precise apnea event localization, duration estimation, and subtype classification. While ApneaWhisper performs robustly for OSA, challenges remain in distinguishing central (CSA) and mixed (MSA) sleep apnea, due to subtle or ambiguous acoustic patterns. The frame-level segmentation also facilitates accurate apnea–hypopnea index (AHI) estimation, which could reduce dependence on full PSG studies in certain clinical and home-monitoring scenarios. Future improvements may involve multimodal integration (eg, oxygen saturation) and noise-robust training techniques.Keywords: sleep apnea, sleep breathing, deep learning, audio segmentation, whisper, transformer

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.102
GPT teacher head0.487
Teacher spread0.385 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicCutaneous Melanoma Detection and ManagementFrench-language works237,207