MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7084937145 · doi:10.1109/tbc.2025.3611640

IRS-Assisted Joint Broadcast/Multicast Resource Allocation and Cooperative Perception Optimization for 6G V2X Networks

2025· article· en· W7084937145 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Broadcasting · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBotany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies
Canadian institutionsIntertek (Canada)
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Key Research Program of Chongqing Science and Technology CommissionNatural Science Foundation of Chongqing
KeywordsResource allocationReliability (semiconductor)Interference (communication)Fuse (electrical)Task (project management)Key (lock)Orthogonal frequency-division multiplexingJoint (building)Resource management (computing)Multicast

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aiming at the coexistence challenges of highly reliable broadcast/multicast communication and high-precision cooperative sensing in 6G vehicular networking, this paper proposes an IRS-enhanced joint optimization framework. First, an IRS-assisted millimeter-wave-terahertz heterogeneous network architecture is constructed to reconfigure multi-vehicle communication links through dynamically programmable reflective units to solve the signal occlusion and interference problems in traditional multicast scenarios; second, a cooperative sensing task modeling method based on GAT is designed to fuse LiDAR point-cloud data and camera information into spatio-temporal sensing features to drive dynamic resource allocation demand; finally, the HFRL algorithm is proposed to jointly optimize the IRS phase matrix, broadcast spectrum allocation, computational offloading strategy and perception task priority. The simulation results show that the sensing accuracy has increased from 68.5% of the baseline to 90.5%, the URLLC reliability is 99.999%, and the spectral efficiency is 5.2 bps/Hz.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.796
Threshold uncertainty score0.904

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on BroadcastingSame topicBotany, Ecology, and Taxonomy StudiesFrench-language works237,207