New Insights into the Potential of Obicetrapib, a Cholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein Inhibitor, to Reduce Vascular Contributions to Cognitive Impairment and Dementia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) remains a leading cause of dementia worldwide, with complex pathophysiology involving amyloid deposition and tau pathology that precedes cognitive decline. Cardiovascular risk factors, including hypertension, type II diabetes, and dyslipidemia, are recognized as modifiable risk factors of AD, especially during midlife, underscoring the close interplay between AD and vascular contributions to cognitive impairment and dementia (VCID). Anti-amyloid immunotherapies offer potential for disease modification; however, they can transiently increase cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA), which may lead to serious and potentially fatal adverse effects known as amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA). These risks are particularly elevated in apolipoprotein E4 (APOE4) carriers, the major genetic risk factor for late-onset AD, underscoring the urgent need for improved safety measures and patient stratification strategies. Notably, the vascular pathways implicated in ARIA may overlap with mechanisms of amyloid clearance influenced by lipid metabolism. The objective of this study is to review how lipoproteins, including low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), influence amyloid clearance and vascular health, and discuss how cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP), a key regulator of lipoprotein exchange, has emerged as a potential therapeutic target in dementia. In addition to effectively lowering LDL-C and increasing HDL-C, the CETP inhibitor obicetrapib has recently shown promising results in slowing progression of a key AD biomarker, p-tau-217, over 12-month of treatment in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, with more pronounced effects in APOE4 carriers. This minireview thus highlights the intersection of cardiovascular and neurodegenerative pathways and supports further exploration of lipid-modulating therapies in AD and VCID.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".