MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7085209493 · doi:10.1109/tts.2025.3611364

6G Cellular Networks: Mapping the Landscape for the IMT-2030 Framework

2025· article· en· W7085209493 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Technology and Society · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsStandardizationThematic mapDocumentationConceptual frameworkWhite paperThematic analysisKey (lock)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The IMT-2030 framework provides the vision and conceptual foundation for the next-generation of mobile broadband systems, colloquially known as Sixth-Generation (6G) cellular networks. Academic circles, industry players, and Standard Developing Organizations (SDOs) are already engaged in early standardization discussions for the system, providing key insights for future technical specifications. In this context, a structured thematic review of literature contributions aligned with IMT-2030 is essential to inform the discussions and assist collaboration among 6G stakeholders—including scholars, professionals, regulators, and SDO officials. This article adopts a semi-systematic methodology to identify, analyze, and synthesize 6G literature across five core thematic areas: (1) 6G Vision, (2) Use Cases, Performance Requirements, and Architectural Trends (3) Enabling Technologies, (4) Impact on Vertical Sectors, and (5) the 6G Research Frontier. The core themes follow an evolution-oriented structure that mirrors the transition from 5G to 6G, in line with the design principles, use cases, technical capabilities, and technological trends outlined for IMT-2030. To ensure coverage of well-established contributions, the article screens literature published between 2019 and 2025 using IEEE Xplore and Scopus databases, prioritizing highly cited papers, seminal white papers, and early SDO documentation aligned with the IMT-2030 framework. This approach balances breadth and depth, allowing for a representative overview of the field. By combining structured screening with thematic synthesis, this article delivers a concise yet comprehensive account of 6G literature for both specialists and generalists engaged in shaping future standards and advancing 6G research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.811
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Technology and SocietySame topicPlant Pathogenic Bacteria StudiesFrench-language works237,207