MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7089258843 · doi:10.7860/jcdr/2025/76702.21994

Evaluation of Traditional Exercises versus Continuous Passive Motion and Cryotherapy in Knee Osteoarthritis: An Interventional Study

2025· article· en· W7089258843 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicExercise and Physiological Responses
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCryotherapyStatistical significanceVisual analogue scaleOsteoarthritisRange of motionContinuous passive motionKnee JointQuality of life (healthcare)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common degenerative joint disease and the second most frequent rheumatologic condition in India, affecting approximately 39% of the population, with a higher prevalence among women. The knee is a major site for OA, which impacts mobility and quality of life. Aim: The study aims to assess the efficacy of two treatment protocols for knee OA; Traditional exercises versus Continous Passive Motion (CPM) and cryotherapy. Materials and Methods: The study was an interventional study. The total duration of the study is one month from Feb 2023 to March 2023. The study included female participants aged 40 to 60 years, all diagnosed with primary OA of the knee. Total sample size was 30 (each Group 15). The present experimental study involved 30 female patients aged 40-60 years with primary knee OA. They were divided into two groups: group A received Continuous Passive Motion (CPM) combined with cryotherapy, and group B received conventional therapy. Each patient underwent a 20-30 minute treatment session once daily for four weeks. Pain and function were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scales. Statistical analysis was conducted using paired and independent t-tests with significance set at p≤0.05. Results: Both treatment groups showed significant improvements in mobility and pain reduction by the end of the study. However, group A, which received perturbation training, demonstrated a higher degree of pain reduction with a VAS score of 1.20±0.414 compared to group B’s score of 1.93±0.798. Statistical analysis indicated that this difference was significant, with group A experiencing greater pain relief than group B at a significance level of p≤0.05. Conclusion: The findings suggest that while both treatment protocols are effective for managing knee OA symptoms, CPM and cryotherapy offer a greater benefit in reducing pain compared to traditional exercises. This highlights the potential of perturbation training as a valuable addition to OA management strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.035
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.722
Threshold uncertainty score0.973

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.035
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.329
GPT teacher head0.544
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCHSame topicExercise and Physiological ResponsesFrench-language works237,207