MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7091315730 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.17362587

Electric-Field Modeling Toolkit for Type-II Pulsed Bessel-Gaussian Second-Harmonic Generation in KTP

2025· other· en· W7091315730 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNonlinear Photonic Systems
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolygon meshNonlinear systemFortranParametric statisticsMesh generationCodebasePotassium titanyl phosphate

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This toolkit addresses the computational modeling of three-dimensional time-dependent electric-field distributions in type-II pulsed Bessel-Gaussian second-harmonic generation within potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP) crystals, where depleted-wave dynamics dominate nonlinear optical conversion. The toolkit solves three coupled nonlinear wave equations for ordinary and extraordinary fundamental waves and extraordinary second-harmonic waves using finite difference methods in cylindrical coordinates. It accepts user-defined parameters including pulse energy, beam spot size, crystal dimensions, and optical properties as inputs, and produces spatiotemporal electric-field amplitude distributions and conversion efficiency profiles as outputs. A unified Fortran codebase provides reproducible simulation pipelines, parametric sweep capabilities for examining interaction length dependencies, and computational optimizations that enable execution on standard desktop systems despite the fine radial meshes required for Bessel-Gaussian beam fluctuations. The implementation reproduces previously published quantitative predictions, specifically confirming that for $\omega_f \approx 80~\mu$m spot sizes and $0.8$~J pulse energies, complete energy exchange occurs over approximately $5$~mm, which validates the necessity of depleted-wave formalism for crystals exceeding this interaction length. The toolkit is available as an open-source GitHub repository and is released as version v1.0.1 under the MIT License.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.443
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicNonlinear Photonic SystemsFrench-language works237,207