Einstein's mathematical deception: Special relativity conceals that it changes the speed <i>c</i> along the X-axis in the stationary frame of reference
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In his famous paper “On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies” [A. Einstein, Ann. Phys. 17 , 891 (1905)], Einstein derived kinematic time dilation by considering a coordinate system k that moves relative to a stationary coordinate system K along the X-axis, where he let the x-axis and the X-axis of the two systems coincide. Einstein defined for light beams moving along the X-axis, which are emitted from the origin of the coordinate system k to the mirror and back to the origin of the coordinate system k, no matter in which direction a light beam moves, each time interval by the sum of the two time intervals x ′/( c − v ) and x ′/( c + v ) divided by 2. Afterwards, Einstein defined x ′ as infinitely small, so that x ′ disappeared and he obtained the differential quotient 1/2[1/( c − v ) + 1/( c + v )]∂ τ /∂ t , from which the kinematic time dilation factor γ squared results if the two terms in the brackets are added. However, after x ′ has disappeared, the change in time is now only defined by the speed c of light and v , where v is a uniform speed. This means that the two quotients within the brackets cannot be added without changing the value of c . By adding the two quotients within the brackets of the differential quotient 1/2[1/( c − v ) + 1/( c + v )]∂ τ /∂ t , Einstein's special relativity (SR) mathematically creates in the stationary frame of reference two different values for the speed of light that differ from the value of c . Einstein was able to conceal that SR mathematically alters the laws of nature because his derivation of kinematic time dilation along the X-axis does not change the letter “ c ,” but only the value of c . Einstein's miracle year is demystified here and a theory of relativity without mathematical tricks is presented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".