MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7092178687 · doi:10.1109/tpel.2025.3621463

Highly Efficient Nonlinear Torque Control of Induction Motor Drives Considering Magnetic Saturation and Iron Losses

2025· article· en· W7092178687 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSensorless Control of Electric Motors
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)StatorInduction motorInductanceNonlinear systemTorqueSaturation (graph theory)Feedback linearization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, an input-output feedback linearization (IOFL)-based direct torque control (DTC) is proposed for induction motor (IM) drives using the maximum torque per Ampere (MTPA) strategy and full nonlinear IM model. In contrast to conventional IOFL technique, the stability of the proposed IOFL is proven by Lyapunov theory. The proposed method not only provides an appropriate tracking of electromagnetic torque, but also leads to an optimal relation between direct (d)- quadrature (q) axis stator currents. Since both MTPA strategy and IOFL control depend on the IM model, more accurate dynamic modelling including effects of magnetic saturation and iron losses is essential. In this regard, a fifth-order IM model developed based on a full nonlinear model is used in the controller design by considering variations of magnetizing inductance and iron loss resistance in terms of the magnetic current and rotor speed, respectively. The proposed control scheme is validated by experimental results showing a significant reduction in the stator current for a light load compared to the conventional model, in which saturation and iron losses are neglected.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.321
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Power ElectronicsSame topicSensorless Control of Electric MotorsFrench-language works237,207