Highly Efficient Nonlinear Torque Control of Induction Motor Drives Considering Magnetic Saturation and Iron Losses
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, an input-output feedback linearization (IOFL)-based direct torque control (DTC) is proposed for induction motor (IM) drives using the maximum torque per Ampere (MTPA) strategy and full nonlinear IM model. In contrast to conventional IOFL technique, the stability of the proposed IOFL is proven by Lyapunov theory. The proposed method not only provides an appropriate tracking of electromagnetic torque, but also leads to an optimal relation between direct (d)- quadrature (q) axis stator currents. Since both MTPA strategy and IOFL control depend on the IM model, more accurate dynamic modelling including effects of magnetic saturation and iron losses is essential. In this regard, a fifth-order IM model developed based on a full nonlinear model is used in the controller design by considering variations of magnetizing inductance and iron loss resistance in terms of the magnetic current and rotor speed, respectively. The proposed control scheme is validated by experimental results showing a significant reduction in the stator current for a light load compared to the conventional model, in which saturation and iron losses are neglected.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".