Bibliographic record
Abstract
Polibio de Megalópolis compone en esta “Historia universal bajo la República romana” una crónica total de los sucesos que, desde la Olimpíada 140, confluyen en un único cuerpo histórico: el ascenso de Roma a la hegemonía mediterránea. Su exordio proclama la utilidad moral de la historia y anuncia el enigma que guía el libro: cómo, en apenas cincuenta y tres años, los romanos sojuzgaron casi toda la tierra; para comprenderlo, vincula Italia, África, Asia y Grecia en una narración continua y causal. Polibio rechaza la parcialidad y exige verdad; por eso discute a Filino y a Fabio, corrigiendo sus relatos con método, comparación y crítica de fuentes. La obra avanza con precisión militar: de Messina y Regio a la primera guerra púnica; del asedio de Agrigento al salto naval con el “corvus”; de Mila y Ecnomo al desembarco en África; del triunfo de Régulo a su catástrofe ante Jantipo; y, más allá, al bloqueo de Lilibea y los virajes de la fortuna. El resultado es una historia universal que explica causas, estrategias y contingencias y enseña, con rigor y amplitud, el mecanismo por el cual una república, sobria en costumbres y recursos, se convirtió en potencia global duradera y hegemónica. Dr. Jorge Fymark Vidovic Lópezhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8148-4403 Director Editorialhttps://www.edicionesclio.com/
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.028 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".