MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7092193596 · doi:10.18280/isi.300805

GPCB: A Hybrid GA-PSO and Transformer-guided CNN-BiLSTM Framework for Cardiovascular Disease Prediction

2025· article· W7092193596 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueIngénierie des systèmes d information · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicECG Monitoring and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiseaseComponent (thermodynamics)Identification (biology)Key (lock)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of death worldwide, so predicting risk as soon as possible and accurately is necessary to provide timely intervention.However, previous interpretive models perform poorly due to overfitting, poor feature selection, and substantively poor management of heterogeneous clinical and behavioral data.To improve the classification of CVD risk, this paper presents a framework termed as GPCB.This combines Genetic Algorithm -Particle Swarm Optimization (GA-PSO) for feature selection with a deep learning model construction that includes transformers, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), and Bidirectional Long Short Term Memory (Bi-LSTM) models (T-CBLSTM).During phase I, the GA-PSO module performs multi-objective feature optimization when predicting by comparing and assessing predictive relevance and minimizing input dimensions, allowing a reasonable selection of clinical and lifestyle features that were meaningfully relevant.In phase II, a feature extracted and selected T-CBLSTM model was constructed to compose the model, where the CNN layers extracted spatial patterns, the Transformer blocks accounted for global dependencies in the data, and the Bi-LSTM layers attended to the sequential relationships.This framework was evaluated on the UCI Heart Disease, Framingham Heart Study, and MIMIC-III datasets as well as the merged datasets.The experimental results demonstrate that GPCB-TC outperformed the state-of-the-art accuracy up to 98.3%, F1-score 97.6%, and AUC-ROC 0.98.The proposed model shows immense opportunities for development and implementation in clinical decision support systems by offering risk assessment in a real-world healthcare practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.898
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIngénierie des systèmes d informationSame topicECG Monitoring and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207