MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Technical Report

2025· other· W7092303945 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2025
Typeother
Language
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Conservation and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiodiversityConvention on Biological DiversityHeadlineSustainable developmentGlobal biodiversityBiodiversity conservationExtinction (optical mineralogy)Protected area

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The National Biodiversity Assessment (NBA) is a report on the status of South Africa’s biodiversity across terrestrial, freshwater, estuarine, and marine realms. The report synthesises the best available data on biodiversity in South Africa, in a format to support policy and environmental decision-making. The results of the NBA is utilised in reporting on South Africa’s commitments to several international multilateral environmental agreements such as the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). A key focus of the report is two headline indicators on the status of species and ecosystems: Threat status, which tracks changes in species’ risk of extinction and ecosystems’ risk of collapse over time, and protection level, which measures the contribution of protected areas in meeting species and ecosystem conservation targets. The species protection level indicator is South Africa's domesticated version of the Species Protection Index, a component indicator for Target 3 of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework.This report describes how protection level is calculated for plant species and covers topics such as data sources, data preparation, setting of species conservation targets, consideration of protected area effectiveness, and calculation of Protection Index time series.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.733
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9970.264

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareSame topicEnvironmental Conservation and ManagementFrench-language works237,207