MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7092356848 · doi:10.26108/bbfa-ep74

Two studies of larids on Prince Edward Island

2004· article· en· W7092356848 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueAcadiaU-DEV · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicBird parasitology and diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLouseFeatherFish <Actinopterygii>Infection rateNest (protein structural motif)Reproductive success

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Little is known about the chewing louse community of ring-billed gull (Larus delawarensis) chicks, or about the effects of the lice on that species. Chewing lice are relatively benign parasites but they can have a detrimental effect on their host, largely by decreasing feather mass, which can increase metabolic rate and thermal conductance. l investigated the effects of chewing lice on ring-billed gull chicks by testing for a relationship between louse load and stress and between louse load and cell-mediated immunnocompetence. To assess stress level I determined heterophil:lymphocyte ratios. I assessed cell-mediated immune response by performing PHA skin tests. Louse loads were found by dust-ruffling the chicks. Total louse load was not related to either stress or cell-mediated immune response. Three species of chewing lice were found on the chicks and lice were removed from approximately 97% of the chicks. Common tems (Sterna hirundo) are long-lived seabirds that can permanently abandon breeding nests, and even chicks, when disturbed. I investigated whether or not a fireworks display in Charlottetown Harbor was disturbing a nearby common tern colony and causing reproductive failure. I monitored feeding rate and panic flight rate in the pre-fireworks and post-fireworks period and did not find any significant change in behavior. The terns did not abandon and there was reproductive success.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.364
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAcadiaU-DEVSame topicBird parasitology and diseasesFrench-language works237,207