Canada’s climate policy crossroads: Supply-side pressures and competing energy futures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
• Canada’s greenhouse gas emissions goals are at odds with its intentions for fossil fuel production. • The provinces most dependent on oil and gas extraction avoid aligning production with territorial emissions reductions. • In contrast, Quebec has foregone fossil fuel development to become a climate policy leader. • Fossil fuel dependency creates economic vulnerability as global demand shifts. • Canadian climate policy requires a dual focus on both fossil fuel supply and demand. This article documents interprovincial variation in climate and energy policy trends within Canada to explore the disconnect between climate ambition and aspirations for fossil fuel production. We compare subnational policies concerning domestic emissions and fossil fuel production within and across four provinces. Unsurprisingly, the provinces most economically dependent on fossil fuel production are both committed to expanding production and less ambitious with respect to reducing their emissions within their borders. Yet Quebec took a different path, forgoing development of its oil and gas reserves, and instead focusing on deep emissions reductions and building a lower-carbon economy that will be more resilient in the ongoing global energy transition. In a more ambivalent policy position, British Columbia has committed to expanding gas production for export, yet has remained relatively ambitious with respect to reducing its territorial emissions. Set in the overarching national energy and climate policy context, this article underscores the disconnect between production and territorial emission policies, one that leaves Canada economically vulnerable while the global energy transition unfolds, decreasing global fossil fuel demand.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".