MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7092575023 · doi:10.57745/dqf4tb

Curated and Analysed Historical Barley (Hordeum sps.) Phenotypic Data from seven European genebanks

2025· dataset· W7092575023 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueRecherche Data Gouv France · 2025
Typedataset
Language
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicWheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
Canadian institutionsCanadian Arctic Resources Committee
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOutlierPhenotypeReplication (statistics)Range (aeronautics)Identification (biology)GenotypePhenotypic trait

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dataset compiles historical phenotypic records of Barley (Genus: Hordeum) accessions evaluated across multiple years and locations by seven European genebanks participating in the AGENT project. The data originate from long-term evaluation trials conducted under diverse agro-ecological conditions and represent one of the most comprehensive multi-environment phenotypic collections of barley genetic resources in Europe. The dataset includes raw phenotypic data, outlier-corrected data, and best linear unbiased estimates (BLUEs) for a wide range of agro-morphological and developmental traits. Traits typically include, but are not limited to, days to heading (DTH), plant height (PH), thousand kernel weight (TKW), and other agronomic descriptors recorded according to national or genebank-specific descriptors. The outlier-corrected dataset represents cleaned phenotypic data after statistical identification and removal of erroneous values using a mixed-model approach. The BLUE dataset provides adjusted means per accession, accounting for design and replication effects, and serves as a robust input for downstream analyses such as genomic prediction and genotype x environment interaction studies. The author gratefully acknowledges the teams from IPK, INRAE and the CARC genebank for their valuable support and guidance, as well as the collaboration of all AGENT genebanks contributing to this study. References: 1) Bernal-Vasquez, AM., Utz , HF. & Piepho, HP. Outlier detection methods for generalized lattices: a case study on the transition from ANOVA to REML. Theor Appl Genet 129, 787–804 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-016-2666-6 2) Philipp N, Weise S, Oppermann M, Börner A, Graner A, Keilwagen J, Kilian B, Zhao Y, Reif JC and Schulthess AW (2018) Leveraging the Use of Historical Data Gathered During Seed Regeneration of an ex Situ Genebank Collection of Wheat. Front. Plant Sci. 9:609. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00609

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0070.009
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.250
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.096 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRecherche Data Gouv FranceSame topicWheat and Barley Genetics and PathologyFrench-language works237,207