MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7093121852

C052 | OUTCOMES OF IMETELSTAT THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH RING SIDEROBLAST–NEGATIVE LOWER-RISK MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES FROM THE POOLED IMERGE STUDY POPULATIONS

2025· article· en· W7093121852 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMyeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnemiaMyelodysplastic syndromesErythropoietinPlaceboPhases of clinical researchRefractory (planetary science)Clinical trial
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The majority of LR-MDS are in the heterogenous group of RS− disease. Current treatment (tx) options are limited in number and efficacy, particularly for pts who are relapsed or refractory (R/R) to or ineligible for erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA). First-line luspatercept (LUS) demonstrated differential efficacy in RS+ vs RS− disease; LUS also showed benefit vs. placebo (PBO) in second-line tx for RS+ disease. Imetelstat (IME) is a first-in-class, direct, and competitive inhibitor of telomerase activity approved for the tx of adult pts with LR-MDS with transfusion-dependent anemia who are R/R to or ineligible for ESAs based on the results of the IMerge trial (NCT02598661). In the RS− LR-MDS subpopulation of the Phase 3 of IMerge (IME, n=44; PBO, n=23), more pts on IME vs PBO (32% vs 9% [P=.038] and 20% vs 0% [P=.019]) achieved ≥8-wk and ≥24-wk red blood cell transfusion independence (RBC-TI), respectively. This post hoc analysis evaluated outcomes in pts with RS− LR-MDS pooled from the 3 parts of IMerge (Phase 2, 3, and QTc substudy) who received IME 7.1 mg/kg active dose (7.5 mg/kg IME sodium) or PBO via 2-h IV infusion every 4 wk. At data cutoff dates (Phase 2/3, 10/13/2023; QTc substudy, 10/13/2024), 78 IME-treated pts had RS− disease (median [range]: 26 mo [1-87] on-study follow-up). Baseline characteristics were similar to the Phase 3 overall population: median baseline transfusion burden of 6.5 U/8 wk, median time from initial diagnosis of 2.8 y, 51% had serum erythropoietin ≤500 mU/mL, and 79% and 6% had prior ESA and LUS, respectively. Of these pts, 33% achieved ≥8-wk RBC-TI (median duration of response [mDOR],44 wk), 21% achieved ≥24-wk RBC-TI (mDOR,123 wk), and 13% achieved ≥1-y RBC-TI (mDOR,141 wk). Hematologic improvement-erythroid (HI-E) per International Working Group (IWG) 2006 showed transfusion reduction ≥4 U/8 wk and hemoglobin (Hb) rise ≥1.5 g/dL lasting ≥8 wk in 55% and 24% of pts, respectively. Per HI-E IWG 2018, 11 and 67 pts had low transfusion burden [LTB] and high transfusion burden [HTB], respectively. 36% of LTB pts achieved an HI-E response (16-wk RBC-TI). 22% and 40% of HTB pts achieved major (16-wk RBC-TI) and minor (50% RBC transfusion reduction/16 wk) HI-E responses, respectively. Taken together, results from this post hoc analysis align with prior findings and further support that IME has clinical activity in pts with difficult-to-treat RS− disease with a HTB, and with different clinical MDS subtypes with no available tx options.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.006
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.145
GPT teacher head0.502
Teacher spread0.357 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicMyeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207