MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7093311543 · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.30422329

Tetrahydro-benzothiophene ROR gamma t Inverse Agonists to Target Th17 in a Sensitized Skin Allograft Mouse Model

2023· other· W7093311543 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2023
Typeother
Language
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicPsoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInverse agonistTacrolimusRAR-related orphan receptor gammaAgonistTransplantationRetinoic acidReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

🧾 AbstractBackground: Th17 cells play a critical role in acute cellular as well as in chronic antibody mediated allograft rejection. We have recently designed tetrahydro-benzothiophene derivatives as novel inverse agonists of retinoic acid receptor-related orphan receptor gamma t (RORγt) and demonstrated in vitro activity in Th17 polarization assay from PBMCs. The objective of the current study is to determine the effect of tetrahydro-benzothiophene derivatives on the rejection of complete mismatch skin graft in a sensitized murine model. Methods: C57BL/6 mice were sensitized by administration of 10^7 Balb/c splenocytes (IP) at day 0, 7 and 14 and transplanted with Balb/c skin grafts at day fifteen. Mice were injected daily with a tetrahydro-benzothiophene RORγt inverse agonist (TF-S14, 1mg/kg, IP), or tacrolimus (0.5mg/kg, IP) or combination. Graft survival was evaluated daily for rejection end point (100% necrosis). Skin grafts were sampled at day five for histology. Results: Tetrahydro-benzothiophene RORγt inverse agonist prolonged median graft survival from 6 to 13.5 and from 7 to 23 days when combined with tacrolimus, Figure 1. Neutrophilic infiltration of skin-grafts decreased in RORγt inverse agonist, or combination therapy compared to vehicle or tacrolimus treated mice, Figure 2. Conclusions: The novel tetrahydro-benzothiophene RORγt inhibitor offers a new therapeutic mechanism to treat rejection in highly sensitized patients regardless of degree of donor mismatch.🗓️ Presentation NoteThis abstract represents a reformatted and regionally presented version of the same experimental work initially showcased at the American Transplant Congress (ATC 2023) on 7 June 2023, emphasizing the tetrahydro-benzothiophene scaffold and its translational relevance in Th17-mediated rejection.📁 File DescriptionFouda_Abstract_ESOT2023_Original.pdf — Original version of the abstract. This is the identical file submitted and published on the ESOT 2023 Virtual Congress platform (Abstract ID: 397466; Session: BOS2_12; Presented: 19 September 2023).Abstract_ESOT2023_Booklet_Page109.pdf — Scanned page (p. 109) from the printed Proc. Eur. Soc. Organ Transplant. Congr. 2023 booklet containing the same abstract.📍 Conference and MetadataPresented at: 21st International Transplant Congress of the European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT 2023) Presentation Date: 19 September 2023 Location: Athens, Greece Abstract Category: Transplantation Immunology Presentation Type: Oral PresentationAuthors: Ahmed Fouda, Mohamed-Taoubane Maallah, Sarita Negi, Steven Paraskevas, Jean Tchervenkov Affiliation: Department of Experimental Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada 📚 Full CitationFouda, A.; Maallah, M. T.; Negi, S.; Paraskevas, S.; Tchervenkov, J. Tetrahydro-benzothiophene RORγt Inverse Agonists to Target Th17 in Sensitized Skin Allograft Mouse Model. In Proc. Eur. Soc. Organ Transplant. Congr. 2023; 21, p. 109 (Abstr. 23). 21st Congress of the European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT 2023), Athens, Greece, 17–20 September 2023. Also published in ESOT Virtual Congress 2023 (Abstract ID: 397466; Session: BOS2_12; Presented: 19 September 2023). DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.30422329 © 2023, Ahmed Fouda.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MIND→Same topicPsoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis→French-language works237,207→