Reconstruction Of Islamic Education Goals In The Modern Era Perspectives Of Western Classical Philosophers And Muslim Philosophers
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study examines the concept of educational objectives and Islamic educational objectives based on the thoughts of Western classical philosophers (Plato and John Dewey) and Muslim philosophers (Al-Ghazali, Ibn Sina, and Al-Farabi). Plato saw education as a means of achieving universal wisdom and truth through moral and intellectual development, while John Dewey emphasized education as a pragmatic tool for forming individuals who think critically and can actively participate in a democratic society. On the other hand, in the context of Islamic education, Al-Ghazali emphasized education as a spiritual process to get closer to God, Ibn Sina combined intellectual education and science to achieve human perfection, while Al-Farabi emphasized education as a tool to achieve moral happiness and social balance. The problem that arises is the difference in focus: general education (Plato and Dewey) emphasizes more on the development of rationality, morality, and social engagement, while Islamic education emphasizes more on the balance between spirituality, rationality, and moral responsibility. The research method used is comparative literature analysis, where the main thoughts of these figures are analyzed philosophically to identify ideal educational goals. The results showed that general education, according to Plato, focused on wisdom and morality, while Dewey emphasized active learning relevant to practical life. Islamic education, according to Al-Ghazali, is more oriented towards spirituality, Ibn Sina on rationality and science, and Al-Farabi on moral and intellectual balance to create an ideal society. The contribution of this research is to answer the challenges of modern education by reconstructing the current educational goals so that education can create individuals who can think critically, be ethical or moral, and have strong life skills. A need for the reconstruction of holistic educational goals that develop intellectual, moral, and spiritual as a result of the synthesis of thinking about the goals of Western philosophy education and Islamic philosophy. Strategic steps taken based on the results of the research include the development of an integrated curriculum, the implementation of active and adaptive learning, the integration of character education and ethics in the curriculum, the use of technology for spiritual and moral education, teacher training in the modern era and the formation of value-based progressive policies with a holistic approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it