MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7093328334 · doi:10.5282/ubm/epub.128812

Media Platforms, Formats, and News Cultures

2025· article· en· W7093328334 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueCity Research Online (City University London) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMedia Studies and Communication
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsJournalismPoliticsLatin AmericansRepresentation (politics)Face (sociological concept)Stereotype (UML)Gender gap

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ge and gender present the face of journalism, while years of professional experience indicate journalists' commitment to their work.Since the previous wave of the Worlds of Journalism Study (WJS2), conditions for journalism and journalists have undergone significant shifts.Changes in information channels, alongside political and economic headwinds, have left visible marks on journalists' age and experience profiles, while other demographic characteristics, such as gender and education level, have remained relatively stable. GENDERGlobally, journalism remains slightly male-dominated, with just under half of respondents across the 75 countries identifying as female (see Table 2).This represents only a modest increase in female participation compared to WJS2 (Josephi et al., 2019) and earlier studies, which consistently identified journalism as predominantly male (Weaver et al., 2012).Female representation varies considerably across countries, reflecting diverse national contexts and levels of gender empowerment.Women constitute a majority of journalists in 30 of the 75 countries surveyed, exceeding 60% in 11 countries.Most of these are in Northern and Eastern Europe, including Moldova-where nearly three in four journalists are female-as well as Ukraine, Latvia, Romania, Croatia, Lithuania, Bulgaria, and Finland.Southeast Asian countries such as Singapore and Thailand also report high female representation.Conversely, significant gender disparities persist in favor of men in 14 countries, particularly in South, Central, and East Asia, including India, Pakistan, Uzbekistan, South Korea, and Indonesia.Women are also clearly outnumbered in several Arab countries, such as Yemen, Egypt, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE).In Latin America, women generally remain a minority, except in Brazil, Venezuela, and Cuba.Worldwide, 135 journalists (0.4%) identified as "other."North America (Cuba: 2.9%; USA: 2.7%; Canada: 1.9%) and Thailand (2.4%) reported the highest percentages for nonbinary genders.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.028
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.064

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.028
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0120.007
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.095
GPT teacher head0.396
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCity Research Online (City University London)Same topicMedia Studies and CommunicationFrench-language works237,207