Bibliographic record
Abstract
Biocentrizam je u filozofsku etiku ušao razmjerno kasno, u dvadesetom stoljeću, prvenstveno preko djela Fritza Jahra koji je skovao termin 'bio-etika' i po uzoru na Kantov kategorički imperativ formulirao bio-etički imperativ. Ta filozofska pozicija ubrzo je zaboravljena. Pedesetak godina kasnije ponovno su ju formulirali europski filozofi poput Hansa Jonasa i Arnea Næssa, ali i mnogi drugi filozofi, bilo kontinentalnog ili analitičkog kova, svaki na svoj specifični način, a biocentričkom se može smatrati i pozicija Alberta Schweitzera koji je djelovao u isto vrijeme kad i Jahr. Ono svima njima zajedničko jest proširivanje područja etičke refleksije, koja je prethodno uključivala isključivo ljudski rod, na životinje, biljke, ali i Planet u cjelini. Kritika kapitalističkog konzumerizma koji mahnito troši ljudskom rodu zajedničke resurse također čini važan dio biocentričke misli, kao i proširivanje područja odgovornosti s neposredne sadašnjosti na buduće generacije i opće prilike koje će njih zateći zahvaljujući našem sadašnjem odnosu prema životu i Zemlji.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.051 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".