Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Dialectic of Selfhood in Montaigne (Frederick Rider) (Reviewed by Glyn P. Norton, The Pennsylvania State University)Psyche & Symbol in Shakespeare (Alex Aronson) (Reviewed by Michael McCanles, Marquette University)Shakespeare's Patterns of Self-Knowledge (Rolf Soellner) (Reviewed by Michael McCanles, Marquette University)Cardinal Newman in His Age: His Place in English Theology and Literature (Harold L. Weatherby) (Reviewed by Nina King, )Rhetorical Form of Carlyle's "Sartor Resartus" (Gerry H. Brookes) (Reviewed by Edward Sharples, Wayne State University)Puritan Temper and Transcendental Faith: Carlyle's Literary Vision (A. Abbott Ikeler) (Reviewed by Edward Sharples, Wayne State University)Carlyle and Dickens (Michael Goldberg) (Reviewed by Edward Sharples, Wayne State University)Dickens and Carlyle: The Question of Influence (William Oddie) (Reviewed by Edward Sharples, Wayne State University)William Carlos Williams: The Later Poems (Jerome Mazzara) (Reviewed by William Stafford, Lewis and Clark College)Lyric and Polemic. The Literary Personality of Roy Campbell (Rowland Smith) (Reviewed by Allan E. Anstin, University of Guelph)Walt Whitman, Leaves of Grass, A Norton Critical Edition (Sculley Bradley and Harold W. Blodgett) (Reviewed by Stephen A. Black, Simon Fraser University)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.011 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.126 | 0.020 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".