MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7093845884

Detecting Spectral Breaks in Spiked Covariance Models

2024· preprint· en· W7093845884 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Methods and Inference
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsCovarianceCovariance matrixNoise (video)Estimation theoryStatistical analysis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, the key objects of interest are the sequential covariance matrices $\mathbf{S}_{n,t}$ and their largest eigenvalues. Here, the matrix $\mathbf{S}_{n,t}$ is computed as the empirical covariance associated with observations $\{\mathbf{x}_1,\ldots,\mathbf{x}_{ \lfloor nt \rfloor } \}$, for $t\in [0,1]$. The observations $\mathbf{x}_1,\ldots,\mathbf{x}_n$ are assumed to be i.i.d. $p$-dimensional vectors with zero mean, and a covariance matrix that is a fixed-rank perturbation of the identity matrix. Treating $\{ \mathbf{S}_{n,t}\}_{t \in [0,1]}$ as a matrix-valued stochastic process indexed by $t$, we study the behavior of the largest eigenvalues of $\mathbf{S}_{n,t}$, as $t$ varies, with $n$ and $p$ increasing simultaneously, so that $p/n \to y \in (0,1)$. As a key contribution of this work, we establish the weak convergence of the stochastic process corresponding to the sample spiked eigenvalues, if their population counterparts exceed the critical phase-transition threshold. Our analysis of the limiting process is fully comprehensive revealing, in general, non-Gaussian limiting processes. As an application, we consider a class of change-point problems, where the interest is in detecting structural breaks in the covariance caused by a change in magnitude of the spiked eigenvalues. For this purpose, we propose two different maximal statistics corresponding to centered spiked eigenvalues of the sequential covariances. We show the existence of limiting null distributions for these statistics, and prove consistency of the test under fixed alternatives. Moreover, we compare the behavior of the proposed tests through a simulation study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.278
Threshold uncertainty score0.956

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.178
GPT teacher head0.408
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicStatistical Methods and InferenceFrench-language works237,207